ITEM #176 to "verify" it's Prince Randy Andy?
Yeah, I think it was probably written about him, even thought elements don’t seem to fit (repeated references to hotness and him being really far away from the throne). Beyond the Epstein connection I don’t know who else it could possibly be. The only other possibilities were included in the “and it ain’ts” and apparently in response to a reader question Ted said the person had a HRH which limits the field.
But hopefully it’s just based on popular gossip and not actual facts. I’d like to believe the Windsors no longer have the pull necessary to keep something like this under wraps. It really concerns me if it is true, because in the UK “underaged” means something different than it does here. The age of consent in the UK is only sixteen. While the idea of Andrew (being fifty…) sleeping with a girl under eighteen is disgusting, if she was under sixteen that’d be even worse.
OMG, I am in love with Prince Andrew... he, Bertie and David are my royal loves... do you think the Duke of Schlongsbery is him??? I mean, I'm all for him slutting it about 'cos it'd be such a shame if his fine self went to waste, but underagers is kinda inexcusable... and especially weird since his daughters are quite young... I mean, if it is him, can you imagine being friends with Bea or Eug and going to a sleep over for one of their 15 bday parties??? XD
I hope it’s not him. It’s just a blind item, so it could be total BS. But everyone online seems to think it’s him…
We know he hung out with that pedo Jeffrey Epstein, but so did Fergie so that doesn’t mean anything. I’ve heard Andrew likes to have flings with younger women, but it was like mid-twenties. Not underaged.
If he does like young girls, he would stay away from his daughters’ friends. Old royal policy; you keep your family life and your sex life seperate.
As for Andrew’s hotness, he used to be fine as hell, but I don’t think he’s handsome anymore. Those huge teeth… :(
As fabulous as our Royal Name Generator may be, let’s face it: We debauched Americans at the Awful Truth were dressing up salacious celebs with our Blind Vice Superstars (and lesser Vice
mortals) ages ago. And not to rain on William and Kate's happy day, but we simply cannot leave out the Vice-lovin' Brits! The very shady HRH the Duke of Schlongsbury is like millionth in line to the British throne, but, babes, the law-breaking stud is legally entitled to rule the country, should it come to that. Which is why members of Parliament are super nervous. Hmmm. What’s the handsome duke’s crime? You know how often Queen Elizabeth II purses her lips or changes hats? Triple that figure and you’ve got the number of times Duke Schlongsbury beds underage girls. And the very good-looking heir pays these women, on top of it—adding even more law-breaking badassness to his royal résumé! Queen Liz knows all about it. So, too, do most of the country’s elite, who are positively dead-set on gossiping about these things, but rarely doing anything about it. Only this time, certain members of Parliament feel they’re legally bound to try and stop the throne-line naughtiness. And the duke, who’s quite used to getting whatever his horny heart desires, is royally pissed. Hey, not nearly as peeved as Schlongbury’s line-up of lovelies! Not only does he pay them extravagantly, he’s got the biggest set of family jewels in all of England! And we’re not talking diamonds.
AND IT AIN’T: Viscount Linley (Princess Margaret’s son), Peter Phillips (Princess Anne’s son) or Prince Michael (Princess Michael of Kent’s husband).
was she a consort? Because I am puzzled as to why she was not named Queen Elizabeth II (that's her daughter's title)
Yeah, she was a consort and they don’t get numbers. It’s all rather complicated. Queen consorts are known as being Queen and can sign their name as such, but they don’t get numbers because they don’t really “reign” in their own right.
Kate Middleton won’t get a number either even though she’s far from the first Queen Catherine.